Rich guys battle for LI paper they killed
By James Ledbetter
It’s been widely reported on Friday that Newsday, one of the papers in the Tribune (TXA) stable, is being courted by three of New York’s oversized businessmen: James Dolan, the head of Cablevision (CVC); Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of News Corp (NWS), which owns the New York Post; and Mort Zuckerman, chairman of Boston Properties (BXP), who also owns the New York Daily News and U.S. News & World Report. Tribune, having recently been taken over by Sam Zell, may be in the mood to sell, given the miserable numbers they filed yesterday: a fourth-quarter loss just shy of $79 million, compared to a $239 million profit the previous year.
Newsday is big (10th largest paper in the U.S. in weekday circulation), profitable and actually has the distinction of being a pretty good newspaper, which you wouldn’t say of all the Tribune papers. Its Web site has grown rapidly in recent years. You can read the New York Times story linked above for more background, but here’s the important sentence:
Newsday illustrates the paradox Tribune faces: The best way to raise cash to meet short-term demands is to sell the very same properties the company would want to keep in the long run because they generate healthy profits.
There is a thick, dolorous irony here. For a little more than a decade - back before the Times Mirror chain merged with Tribune - Newsday published a New York City edition that competed directly with the News and Post. It struggled for years, as Murdoch and Zuckerman did everything they could to undercut it; the News used to air TV ads showing that the view from Melville, Long Island was a cow in a field, to underscore that the paper’s home was outside the five boroughs. (Never mind that the News’s owner for a good portion of that time was in Chicago, and then it was bought by a felonious Brit.)
New York Newsday finally began turning a profit in the mid-90s, even as the Post lost millions and the News “broke even” in its good years. But Times Mirror shut it down anyway, citing an insufficient rate of return.
Now the parent paper may end up in the hands of the guys who killed it. As Jimmy Breslin would say: Beautiful.
I asked Jim Dwyer, a Pulitzer-winning former Newsday columnist now at the Times, what he thought, and he said: “It’s hard to imagine anyone doing worse. Whoever ends up with it will make the current owners look like a combination of Joseph Pulitzer and Iphigene Sulzberger.”
Presumably the Justice Department would have to sign off on a purchase by either Murdoch or Zuckerman, but these are not men who let regulators stand in their way. I would almost say on principle Newsday should go to Dolan, except look what he’s done to the Knicks.
- Fuel prices flatten FedEx
- Countrywide investor fears: Still simmering
- Ed Lampert fund sinks 27%
- Big asset sale coming at Citi?
- Nice price for Fannie Mae stock sale
- AIG dividend boost sends mixed message
- Subprime questions stalk State Street
- Wal-Mart: More shoppers are living paycheck to paycheck
- Warner Music ends dividend
- Takeover rumor lifts WellCare
- Shows you how stupid some of these hi... More
- I will never get over the short-sight... More
- All of the attacks WalMart(fall apart... More
- Ms. Jennifer, Learn how to spell,... More
- Short covering by those who forgot th... More
- i'm with ya, matt. walmart can handl... More
- "it stands by the reserves it took ba... More
- Right on Dave! I haven't set foot th... More
- hey dave if all these wal-mart defend... More
- Look folks...The sub-prime market was... More
- Accrued Interest
- Aleph Blog
- Bespoke Investment Group
- Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- Dealbook
- Econbrowser
- Felix Salmon
- Financial Armageddon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Infectious Greed
- Naked Capitalism
- RGE Monitor
- Seeking Alpha
- Information Arbitrage
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Fortune on CNNMoney.com




I an beginning to wonder if and when the Orlando Sentinel will go under or be up for sale. It was bad enough before Zell bought it but the first thing he did was to increase the price and cut personnel. It is still losing subscribers anbd retail buyers I’m hearing. The ratio of news/adv is way out of line and the “news” is mostly concerned with the school system and the penchant of elected officials to throw tax money around as if it grows on trees.