Novastar on the firing line
Michelle Leder makes a good point at footnoted.org about the disclosure disconnect at mortgage lender Novastar (NFI). The company issued a press release last week announcing that CEO Scott Hartman and finance chief Gregory Metz “will leave the company.” But two days later, in its SEC filing on the subject, Novastar said the two had been “terminated.”
The shift prompts Leder to wonder, “Why would NovaStar not just state the facts the first time around? I mean it’s not as if anyone would be surprised that a company might want to fire the folks who were running the show when the stock dropped through the floor.”
And indeed, disclosure shortfalls are far from the biggest problem at Novastar. The company’s business has collapsed along with the implosion of the subprime mortgage market. Novastar recently posted a third-quarter loss of $64.05 a share, which helps to explain why it has seen its shares drop to $3 and change recently from a reverse split-adjusted $107 apiece at this time last year.
As for the difference between leaving and being terminated, no one answered the phone Friday at Novastar. But note the last line of boilerplate in recent Novastar press releases: “This press release speaks only as of its date and we expressly disclaim any duty to update the information herein.” It seems like that’s not the only duty Novastar’s flacks are disclaiming.
You can’t FIRE Scott. He is the original owners. He left on his own.
Are you an NFI employee yourself? Seem rather defensive for someone that lives in KC (Novastar Corporate Office location)…
You actually get paid to write this gibberish? Slow day at the office? Colin you really need to get a life. I guess a worth while article about a larger corp. was taken. Good luck with the small potatoes.
Here the difference is voluntarily or involuntarily, with severance packages hanging in the balance.
Why isn’t anyone asking why they decided to terminate the deferred comp plan at this time. Seems silly to disburse millions to management given the financial position they’re in.
Whether someone resigns voluntarily or is fired, HR departments still refer to them as “terminated”. I think you are wasting your time on this topic since you are reading too much into the term “terminated”.
- Biovail unit pleads guilty in kickback probe
- Ex-NBA star a deadbeat?
- Abercrombie profit rises
- Update: Subprime ace backs Icahn in Yahoo fight
- Yahoo’s Cuban sandwich
- Icahn starts Yahoo proxy fight
- Countrywide lawsuit moves forward
- CBS buying CNet in online push
- Icahn going after Yahoo board
- JPMorgan making room for Bear workers
- If Microsoft is allowed to buy Yahoo,... More
- Steve, thanks for the comments. Mos... More
- I was one of those people who lost th... More
- CNET is a great source of online cont... More
- This guy a bully, nothing more nothin... More
- Matt, You are absolutelty right. Br... More
- Yahoo is a dieing entity it needs a f... More
- Daryl The reason the Fed will appr... More
- When is the info going to be disclos... More
- WHY would the government approve a me... More
- Accrued Interest
- Aleph Blog
- Bespoke Investment Group
- Big Picture
- Calculated Risk
- Dealbook
- Econbrowser
- Felix Salmon
- Financial Armageddon
- Footnoted
- FT Alphaville
- Infectious Greed
- Naked Capitalism
- RGE Monitor
- Seeking Alpha
- Information Arbitrage
- Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis
- Fortune on CNNMoney.com





Well then, terminated or resigned or retired with a golden parachute, it’s all for naught. Novastar just closed up shop and sent everyone packing. Another one bites the dust.